Pro Igual continues its initiative to survey individual experiences with hate crime in Spain. Si usted ha sido víctima o testigo de un crimen de odio, o conoce a alguien que era, please help us monitor the scope of the phenomenon by [...]
Recientemente, Servicio Europeo de Acción Ciudadana (ECAS) celebrated its 30th Anniversary. Read ECAS Director Assya Kavrakova´s post on ECAS´s accomplishments and aspirations. Pro Igual has been a network member in the field of Human Rights, Inclusion & Nondicrimination for nearly a [...]
Useful resources developed by OSCE Office for Demoratic Istitutions and Huan Rights on the topic of combating hate crimes. Includes model training manuals, guides and methodologies, data and thematic reports from across the OSCE area. Leer más…
The International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women and Girls is celebrated worldwide on November 25 (UN (Resolution 54/134). On occasion of this day, let us remember the names of the female victims of domestic violence in Spain. [...]
On the occasion of the European Victims of Crime Day (22 Febrero) Pro Igual reminds that all victims of hate crime in Spain, irrespective of their legal status, can anonimously share their experiences through its hate crimes survey. There must [...]
As teachers welcome children in classrooms across the continent on the first day back at school, PICUM in which Igualdad participa Pro today launched a new guide to educate about the realities undocumented migrants face across Europe.
The teaching guide, which is available in English, French and Spanish, shows how PICUM’s web documentary “UNDOCUMENTARY” – which showcases the daily realities faced by undocumented migrants living in Europe – may be used in the classroom. It includes an introduction to the issue of irregular migration, detailed background information on featured characters, exercises and activities for school aged children of various age groups, university students and adults as well as foreign language students with different learning objectives, and a range of additional materials and suggested resources.
To view the full press release online, click aquí.
Three years ago Europe saw up close the ugly face of violent #xenophobia & #racism. Let´s honor the victims of the Utoya massacre by say NO to #hatecrimes & #hatespeech. Please sign the petición to make July 22 the European Day for Victims of Hate Crimes. This initiative is promoted by No Hate Speech Movement in which Pro Igual Participates. Clic here to read more.
With the slogan “Words Matter!” the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM) which Pro Igual joined recently launched its leaflet on accurate terminology.
The leaflet provides reasons why not to use the term ‘illegal migrant’ and instead the recognized “indocumentados” o “irregular” migrant, as well as providing a lexicon with translations of the latter terms in all EU languages.
Besides being discriminatory and criminalizing, the term “illegal migrant” is also judicially incorrect, as a person cannot be “illegal” since irregular migration is an administrative, rather than a criminal offence.
For more information on PICUM’s work on terminology, click aquí.
Pro Igual is pleased to announce that our application to become a member of PICUM was formally approved by the PICUM General Assembly on 21 Junio 2014.
Pro Igual´s initiatives specifically regarding undocumented migrants include: campaign Salvemos a la Hospitalidad! alongside other Spanish NGOs which succeeded in having the draft Penal Code amended so to avoid criminalizing any assistance to undocumented migrants. Also, our ongoing activities include domestic and international advocacy for closure of Centros de Internamiento para Extranjeros (CIEs).
We look forward to fruitful cooperation with all the Platform members and supporters to bring greater visibility to the issues surrounding undocumented migrants in Spain and to ensuring human rights for all persons, regardless of their administrative status.
Spanish NGOs across the country have dedicated June the 15ª to actively campaigning for the closure of Internment Centers for Foreigners (CIEs). CIEs are prisons in all but name for foreigners who find themselves in an irregular administrative situation. Pro Igual has written about CIEs in the past and some of our advocacy activities are also related to human rights violations taking places in CIEs.
CIEs exist against a backdrop of the economic crisis and rise in xenophobia exploited by some political forces to gain votes. But declarations demonizing immigrants are not only harmful for social cohesion, they are also patently untrue. Here are 5 persistent myths v. facts regarding immigration in Spain.
Myth 1: Immigrants are “flooding” Spain.
Fact: For several years now Spain has experienced net out-migration, that is, more people leave than come to Spain. According to the figures of the Spanish Institute for Statistics (INE), not only Spanish citizens leave Spain in droves, but also more foreign (non-EU) nationals leave than come.
Myth 2: Immigrants are responsible for most crime in Spain.
Fact: Neither in terms of economic volume (that is, how much money they got through criminal activity), nor in terms of violence, do foreigners lead. In several major corruption cases uncovered in recent years and involving billions of euros, it was Spanish citizens, often holding public office, who were the perpetrators, not immigrants.
Myth 3: Immigrants burden Spanish social security.
Fact: Budget cuts of recent years have left without access to healthcare tens of thousands of immigrants who lost jobs and access to residence. That is despite the fact that immigrants were contributing to economy and social security while they had jobs. At the same time, troubled companies, primarily banks, received billions of public funding after causing economic damage to the country that affected all the rest. Sheer amounts of subsidies to banks dwarf all the (theoretical) welfare payments to Spaniards and immigrants combined.
Myth 4: Foreigners in CIEs are criminals and subject to deportation.
Fact: Less than a quarter of CIE detainees are charged with any infraction. Well over half are released following identification, after having suffered the trauma of de facto imprisonment and on occasion even abuse. There is no need to maintain these expensive and inhuman institutions to address the issues that present less danger to public than traffic violations.
Myth 5: CIEs are “residential centers” for foreigners.
Fact: CIE inmates are often subjected to human rights violations, prompting a nickname “Spanish guantanamos.” Just recently, la Spanish courts ruled against CIE guards accused of rape, beating and other forms of ill-treatment of inmates. And since inmates cannot leave, or for that matter be visited by family at their leisure, CIEs are effectively prisons. The only difference is: there needs to be a crime and a due process in order to throw a person in jail. To get into CIE, it is sufficient to “look foreign” and not have an ID.
Tan, today, Pro Igual joins with our friends and colleagues from other Spanish NGOs in calling for the immediate and complete closure of CIEs.
La Campaña Estatal por el Cierre de los Centros de Internamiento de Extranjeros (CIE), formada por diversas asociaciones y colectivos, está preparando una jornada de protesta para el próximo 15 de junio en todo el Estado con el fin de denunciar y difundir la existencia de este tipo de instalaciones y allanar el camino hacia su cierre definitivo. Se trata del segundo año consecutivo en el que se celebra la jornada. Leer mas…
Watch this space for our initiatives!
See the campaign link (information in Spanish) en: http://15jdiacontraloscie.wordpress.com/
Source: HOPE not hate. | Monday, 26 Mayo 2014
An analytical comment by Cas Mudde
It is clear: the far right “sweeps” Europe and causes an “earthquake” on the troubled continent. The media has spoken! Some even help us identify the “9 scariest far right parties now in the European Parliament.” Thanks Huffington Post UK! All newspapers focus on a select group of winners, mainly in the big countries (France and UK), which picked up large numbers of MEPs.
Let me summarize the far right results and their consequences in seven main points. I’ll start with the most ‘scary’ points, so as to not break too abruptly with the dominant media frame, and slowly work my way to a more balanced interpretation.
1. Far Right as Biggest Party in the Country
Depending on your definition, two or three far right parties became the biggest party in their country. The Danish People’s Party (DFP) and the French National Front (FN) gained 26.6 (+11.8) y 25.0 (+ 18.7) por ciento, respectivamente.
The United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), which I do not (yet?) consider a far right party, is predicted to have scored 27.5 (+11.4) percent of the vote. This is the first time that far right parties come first in nation-wide elections in the European Union (UE) – the Swiss People’s Party (SVP) had been doing it in Switzerland since 1999.
2. Neo-Nazi Parties Will Enter the European Parliament
While the neo-fascist Italian Social Movement (MSI) has been elected to the European Parliament until it transformed into the National Alliance (AN) in 1994, the fascism of that party was more nostalgic than political, and it was not anti-Semitic or racist.
This is different for Golden Dawn (XA) in Greece, which was able to win almost 10 percent of the votes and 3 seats, despite being investigated for political violence and having its leaders in jail.
The National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD), on the other hand, had a poor result (1 por ciento), but profited from the decision of the German Constitutional Court to abolish the three-percent electoral threshold, which gives the NPD one seat.
3. Far Right Parties Won… and Lost
Across the EU far right parties gained 15 seats, going from a total of 37 to 52 Members of European Parliament (MEPs). Given that the FN alone picked up 21 new MEPs, this already indicates important intra-European differences.
In fact, the far right won seats in as many countries as it lost: 6. It won seats in Austria (+2), Dinamarca (+2), France (+21), Alemania (+1), Grecia (+1), and Sweden (+2); it lost seats in Belgium (-1), Bulgaria (-2), Italia (-4), Rumania (-3), Slovakia (-1), and the UK (-2).
Admittedly, this changes to 9 y 5, respectivamente, if you apply a very broad definition of ‘far right’, which includes The Finns (PS), the Latvian National Alliance (NA), the Polish Congress of the New Right (KPN), and UKIP.
4. Far Right Parties Remain Irrelevant in the Majority of EU States
As the media is reducing the EU to France and the United Kingdom, sometimes throwing in Austria and Denmark for good measure, it is important to remember that there are 28 EU member states, and the far remained irrelevant in the majority of them.
The next European Parliament will have far right MEPs from ‘just’ 10 countries (14 in case of a broad definition). That is to say that almost two-thirds of the EU states have no far right representation in the next EP. This is actually higher than in 2009, as four countries lost far right representation and only one gained it.
5. The Far Right Is Mainly a West European Phenomenon!
Ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall, and the ‘return’ of the Central and Eastern European countries, formalized in their integration into the EU since 2004, the former communist part of Europe has been seen as la hotbed of the far right. While this was always at best a skewed view, it has become completely outdated in 2014.
Only one strong far right party remains in the East: the Movement for a Better Hungary (Jobbik), which got 14.7 percent of the votes and three MEPs, which was actually a loss of 0.1 percent compared to 2009 – and of 5.7 percent compared to last month’s national elections in Hungary!
Far right parties lost representation in Bulgaria, Rumania, and Slovakia – the only West European country to loose far right representation was the UK, where the BNP was replaced by a less extreme but much stronger UKIP!
6. The Far Right Did Not Do Well in the Hardest Hit Crisis Countries
As I have argued in more detail elsewhere, the thesis that economic crises lead to the rise of far right parties does not really hold up under scrutiny. This was confirmed in the 2014 Elecciones europeas, where only one of the ‘bailed out’ countries returned far right MEPs (Grecia).
In fact, the highest electoral results of far right parties were almost exclusively in countries that were, in EU-perspective, little to medium affected by the crisis: Austria, Dinamarca, France, Países Bajos, and Sweden. The only exception to this rule is Hungary, which has been hard hit by the crisis and had the fourth-highest score for a far right party.
7.More Far Right MEPs, But Continuing Fragmentation
Finally, although the far right has increased its representation in the European Parliament by 15 MEPs (or one-third), the much-discussed European Alliance for Freedom (EAF) of Marine Le Pen and Geert Wilders is far from certain.
As discussed before aquí, the EAF has the number of seats but not the number of parties (or strictly MEPs). So far only the FN, Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ), Northern League (LN), Party for Freedom (PVV) and Flemish Interest (VB) have committed to the EAF, which brings the current total at 38 MEPs – 13 more than the required 25 – in five countries – two less than required. The Slovak National Party (SNS) was expected to join, but failed to regain its seat in the EP.
This means that the EAF has two options: convince at least two other parties or wait for the inevitable implosion of party factions and pick up individual MEPs from at least two different countries. The latter is most likely, and the UKIP faction is the most obvious recruiting ground, but will mean that the EAF will not become a political group for several months.
During that period, both current commitment (e.g. LN and PVV) and possible future commitments (e.g. DF, SD) could choose money over loyalty and join another group (notably Europe for Freedom and Democracy, EFD).
Original link: http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/news/world/article/1948/the-far-right-and-the-2014-european-elections-in-7-points
Expresar su solidaridad con Dani Alves! Comer un plátano contra el racismo ahora! Tome un selfie y subirlo a la No Hate Speech Movement sitio web: http://
#weareallmonkeys
#somostodosmacacos
Cada año, Informe paralelo de Pro Igual en crímenes de odio en España se centra en los aspectos específicos de este fenómeno. El tema de la 2013 informe, presentado a la OSCE-OIDDH, ha sido recursos para las víctimas.
El telón de fondo de los crímenes de odio en España es grave crisis económica acompañada por el continuo aumento de la xenofobia y el extremismo violento de los grupos neo-nazis. Sin embargo, los recursos disponibles para las víctimas de presuntos crímenes de odio son menos que adecuadas, lo que explica que la denuncia de los crímenes de odio es extremadamente baja, en comparación con las estimaciones informales de incidentes motivados por el odio.
A través de la combinación de la vigilancia y campo de los medios de trabajo, el Pro informe paralelo Igual proporciona una visión general de alto nivel de crímenes de odio reportados en toda España en el curso de 2013 y pone de relieve algunas de las buenas prácticas notificados o puestos en marcha en 2013. Aunque el enfoque de Pro Igual es en la xenofobia y el racismo, crímenes de odio por otra motivación sesgo (tales como la homofobia, discapacidad u orientación política) También se han registrado.
Sobre la base de estos hallazgos, Pro Igual ha hecho la siguiente recomendaciones, tanto a las autoridades españolas ya la unidad de Crímenes de Odio TND OSCE-OIDDH:
Para las autoridades españolas:
Para la OSCE:
El informe completo en Inglés está disponible aquí.
Presentación Pro Igual a la OSCE Delitos de Odio Informe 2012
La vergüenza de España: CIEs, - las cárceles para los "sin papeles"
Tribunal Supremo de España derriba la prohibicion de burka en Lleida
septiembre 1st, 2014 
